I would highly recommend reading the Ashtavakra-Gita.  The first chapter alone perfectly describes Self-liberation.  I’ll reproduce the first chapter here, and leave it to you to read the rest.

Janaka said:
Master, how is Knowledge to be achieved,
detachment acquired, liberation attained?

Ashtavakra said:
To be free, shun the experiences of the senses
like poison. Turn your attention to
forgiveness, sincerity, kindness, simplicity, truth.

You are not earth, water, fire or air.
Nor are you empty space.
Liberation is to know yourself as Awareness alone—
the Witness of these.

Abide in Awareness
with no illusion of person.
You will be instantly free and at peace.

You have no caste or duties.
You are invisible, unattached, formless.
You are the Witness of all things.
Be happy.

Right and wrong, pleasure and pain,
exist in mind only.
They are not your concern.
You neither do nor enjoy.
You are free.

You are the Solitary Witness
of All That Is,
forever free.
Your only bondage is not seeing This.

The thought: “I am the doer”
is the bite of a poisonous snake.
To know: “I do nothing”
is the wisdom of faith.
Be happy.

A single understanding:
“I am the One Awareness,”
consumes all suffering
in the fire of an instant.
Be happy.

You are unbounded Awareness—
Bliss, Supreme Bliss–
in which the universe appears
like the mirage of a snake in a rope.
Be happy.

It is true what they say:
“You are what you think.”
If you think you are bound you are bound.
If you think you are free you are free.

You are Self—the Solitary Witness.
You are perfect, all-pervading, One.
You are free, desireless, forever still.
The universe is but a seeming in You.

Meditate on this: “I am Awareness alone–Unity itself.”
Give up the idea that you are separate, a person,
that there is within and without.

You have long been bound thinking:
“I am a person.”
Let the knowledge: “I am Awareness alone”
be the sword that frees you.

You are now and forever
free, luminous, transparent, still.
The practice of meditation
keeps one in bondage.

You are pure Consciousness—
the substance of the universe.
The universe exists within you.
Don’t be small-minded.

You are unconditioned, changeless, formless.
You are solid, unfathomable, cool.
Desire nothing.
You are Consciousness.

That which has form is not real.
Only the formless is permanent.
Once this is known,
you will not return to illusion.

Just as a mirror exists
both within and without
the image reflected,
the Supreme Self exists
both within and without the body.

Just as the same space exists
both within and without a jar,
the timeless, all-pervasive One
exists as Totality.

Non-dual Moral Accountability

I’d like to briefly discuss some thoughts I’ve been having lately on morality.  If all is one, and everyone is yourself, how can there be any moral accountability?

I think this is based on a misunderstanding.  All moral problems seem to stem from thought processes rooted in ego and false identification with the body.  Take basic things.  We’re told not to steal.  You wouldn’t steal from yourself, so if you view others as yourself, you won’t steal from them.  It’d be like taking something from your own bedroom and placing it in another room.  It makes no sense.  Or how about jealousy?  You’re never jealous with yourself.  You get jealous at what someone else has, but if there are no others, this can’t happen.  How about pride?  You can’t be prideful if there’s nobody else to be superior to.  What about murder?  If you see everyone as yourself, like the entire world is an extension of your own body, who would cut off their own finger?  Chop off their own toes?  In the same way, you’d never inflict pain and suffering on others.  How about greed?  When we eat food, it is broken up in our digestive system and the nourishment is delivered throughout the entire body.  If we came under a condition where no nourishment was making it to say your right hand, we’d call it a disease.  In the same way, if the entire world is viewed as yourself, you’re not going to pollute the waters, or hoard things you don’t need, or overlook people in need of assistance.  If you see someone else suffering, it’s your suffering.  It’s all one and the same.  Seeing someone in pain is like having stubbed your own toe.  You’ll do all you can to alleviate the pain.

Ego is the problem, primarily our false identification with our bodies, thinking we’re separate individuals when we are not.  Ramana Maharshi believes this ego to be the cause of all madness, delusion, and demonic qualities.

Though the nature of Self ever exists as bliss, one is scorched by the burning sunheat of the misery of birth [and death] solely on account of the rising of the ego and its functioning mischievously with the madness of dense delusion.

The ego, the vile attachment to the body [as ‘I am this’], is the base of all demonic qualities [asura sampat]. For those whose illusory ego [Mayaahankara] is waxing through contact with the binding ‘mine’-ness [mamakara], it is indeed impossible to achieve peace.

– Ramana Maharshi

People don’t perceive the divine Oneness within them and everything else.  They get caught up in race, gender, political party affiliations, national pride, class, education, and those sorts of illusion, and that’s just on the human level.  They don’t see their Oneness with the animals, the environment, and the entire cosmos.  They don’t see themselves as the divine awareness looking back at Itself, aware of Itself.  They’re little islands unto themselves, caught up in a confused idea of “mine-ness”, as if everything isn’t already theirs.

And here’s another thing.  As Ramana Maharshi points out, as one rids themselves of this ego, they’re rewarded with inner peace and bliss that’s not based on circumstances.  It comes entirely from within.  People who are happy and at peace generally do not treat others badly.

The deeper I go on this journey, feeling Oneness with everyone and everything, I feel this inner peace and tranquility, and my actions are just naturally kind, thoughtful, and empathetic.  Thoughts to exploit, cheat the system, or harm others don’t even enter my mind.  In fact, my awareness becomes more and more hypersensitive to the “stench” of selfish, nasty behavior, and the like.  I perceive it more clearly, yet it bothers me less and less because I already have my peace within.

People who have truly tasted this inner peace no longer crave the things of this world.

The discriminative person [viveki], having once suffered in the hot sunshine, will not like to go again into the sunshine from the shade. Likewise, those who have suffered in the three-fold heat [of desire for wealth, women and fame] which scorches this world, should not again turn worldwards, leaving the Heart [Self].”
– Ramana Maharshi

I remember chasing this inner peace and could never find it.  I looked for it by changing my career, pursuing relationships, immersing myself in all kinds of distractions, and I could go on.  But I made huge changes in my job and I didn’t feel any different inside.  I met really nice women but it didn’t change me deeply on the inside.  I played every sort of video game, involved myself in hobbies, and every other distraction, and this inner feeling that something was missing was always there, leaving me depressed.  But then I learned I can have peace and inner contentment by going within, finding something I’ve always had but had just covered up in my own delusive thinking, and now I think to myself, “Why would I ever go back to that rat-race maze of misery?”

Life’s no longer some maze.  I no longer have some complex puzzle I have to solve, searching for all the right pieces.  I try to tell people this, but they just sort of look at me like, “Well that’s nice Jason. Good for you.”  This isn’t magic or something.  Rid yourself of false identifications, this stupid ego, this non-existence “self”.  I tell them I could now work any job, even hard physical labor outdoors in the heat and cold, and I’d be just fine.  I see all these layoffs at the university due to budget cuts and I have zero worries.  What does it matter?  I’ll feel the same regardless of how I have to earn my living.  I don’t even desire a relationship anymore, but strangely the women I meet now love me.  I’m no longer needy, or depressing to be around, or timid and shy.  Now I’m extremely attentive and supportive.  I’m told I’m more confident now, but really it’s moreso an inner peace that doesn’t come from her reaction to anything I do or say.  I’m not trying to impress anyone anymore.  As corny as this sounds, when you view others as yourself, your only concern is their happiness and seeing them smile.  Their smile is your smile.  My body and emotions is just one set of things I perceive, but they’re there too.  They’re just as much “there” as my body, and how they’re feeling, and their happiness is just as important as mine.  I might not know how to fix their problems, in the same way I might not know how to stop my stubbed toe from hurting, or end a headache, but I do what I can.

My nature now is to observe and listen and give encouragement.  It comes out of me naturally.  Without ego, that’s just what flows out of you.  I also no longer need distractions.  Just last night I spent the entire evening sitting on the front porch, watching my cat swing its tail back and forth as it slept on the ledge.  I watched the birds fly overhead, listened to the crickets chirping, and exchanged glances with a small kitten who timidly made its way on the porch.  If I’d been caught up in distractions, caught up in this false world of “me me me”, trying to satisfy all these illusory, incessant inner deficits, I wouldn’t have even noticed or had the time to take care of a hungry stray kitten.  But now I’m open.  I’m free.  I’m finally present in reality once again.  I’m actually aware of what’s going on in my front yard, of my neighbors, or my community.  There’s room for something other than this false “me”.  And strangely, I had a BETTER evening than I ever did when I was playing video games all night, or watching movies, and all the other things I used to do.

Jesus taught these things, the Buddah taught these things, great Yogis like Ramana Maharshi taught these things, but I don’t know, I just never got it.  Something about the way Maharshi put it clicked with me.  When reading books with his teachings, some ding, ding, ding bell went off in my head and I found myself exclaiming, “Of course!  Of course!”

My mind today is still a mismatch of this non-egoic, non-dual way of seeing the world, and my old ways of seeing things that I had built up over nearly forty years of living on this planet.  I’m constantly having to undergo Self-inquiry, and place all thoughts under that process, and try to ascertain what causes them.  And guess what?  It’s just as Maharshi says.  Pretty much all of my stray thoughts which caused me misery were rooted in ‘I am the body’ or ‘I am my thoughts’ identifications.  Because I want to rid myself of this stuff, I sit in silence, observe these sensations, these thought patterns, these emotional flows, and watch them come and go from this point of the immovable Self.  Then I noticed, Ah Ha!  I’m grasping at this!  I’m grasping at that!  I’m averting my attention from this or that.  Ah ha!  And as time goes on, I find myself more and more silent.

For those who can scrutinize [enquire into] and know the subtlest thing [Self], what benefit is there by the research on and knowledge of gross objects? Worthier than the research done [by the mind] through the eye and so on, is the indestructible research done within [that is, Self-enquiry or Self-attention].
– Ramana Maharshi

When you are dissatisfied with your life, with your job, with your partner, with society, with the world, whatever it is, the answer isn’t “more”, the answer isn’t “escape”, nor is the answer “change”.  The answer you’re seeking has NOTHING to do with what’s going on out there.   Leave it alone for now.  Seek mental peace.  Seek stillness of mind.  Come to a place where you want nothing and lack nothing.  Have you accomplished this?  Ok.  The things the world needs will be what you’ve developed within yourself.  What needs to be done will now be clear to you.  The right actions will naturally flow out of you.  But if you’re caught up in the same madness the world is in, you’re not going to help anything.

O foolish mind who is suffering due to the desire for the petty pleasures of this world and of the next, if you remain quiet [i.e. without desire] you will certainly attain that State of Bliss which surely transcends the pleasures of these two.
– Ramana Maharshi

Thoughts On the Self and God

If you were to die and have a vision of the Ultimate, what exactly would you see?  Some may seek a full awareness of who they are at the deepest level.  Others may wish to see God in His fullness.  Others seek to know the Truth with a capital T.  After spending a great deal of time meditating and reflecting on this topic, I found myself questioning what sort of experience this would be?  What sort of knowledge would this be?  What sort of emotional feeling would this be?

I found myself thinking about this question after reading a passage from a book containing the teachings of Ramana Maharshi.

God does not reside in any place other than the Heart.
It is due to illusion, caused by the ego, the ‘I am the
body’ idea, that the Kingdom of God is conceived to
be elsewhere. Be sure that the Heart is the kingdom
of God.
– Ramana Maharshi

Jesus said the same thing, “The kingdom of God is within you.”

That got me thinking.  If God is formless, capable of any appearance, and is also omnipresent within everything, then there is no exclusive appearance that should be exclusively identified as “God”.  God created all of that and is beyond any appearance, any thought, or any emotion.

Some envision that when they die and meet God, they’ll enter this beautiful heavenly realm.  They’ll be met by some powerful blinding light which beams unconditional love into their soul, gives them a big hug, and tells them how good it is to see them.  However, that’s just an experience that will come and go, like any other experience.  It’s just a particular state of awareness containing a visual appearance along with emotional feelings.  It’s a nice experience, no doubt about it, but God is beyond form, beyond emotion, and beyond thought.  He’s supposedly the creator of all these things and beyond them all.  It doesn’t seem to me to qualify as an exclusive vision of the Ultimate.

So what are you supposed to see when you’re one with God?  When you’re with God?  When you’re beside God?  Will you sit in empty blank space, in some state of peace?  Will you perceive all possibilities simultaneously, in some timeless state?  Will you see visions of Jesus, or the Buddah, or Shiva?  Once again, those are just forms manifesting within awareness.  God is beyond that.

Then I read some of the insightful commentary contained within the book I just mentioned earlier.

Because we limit Ourself, and believe the tiny, unworthy body to be ‘I’, it becomes necessary to think that there is, apart from ‘I’ some glorious and almighty God, living in a wonderful and faraway Kingdom of His own, who creates this vast universe. In truth, however, since soul, world and God all sprout out and appear from ‘I’, the Source, both God and His Kingdom should be known to be Self.
– Sadhu Om

Then it dawned on me that I’m already this observing Self which contains everything.  I’m already One with It.  This everyday experience of me sitting on my computer, typing this blog entry, that simple experience is just as divine as if Jesus came as a colorful mirage of light over my bed tonight.  I’m already experiencing the Ultimate, everyday.  Right here, right now.

I continued reading on, and Maharshi, along with the book’s commentary,  seemed to read my mind.

Know that you are the perfect, Shining Light which not only makes the existence of God’s Kingdom possible, but also allows it to be seen as a wonderful heaven. To know this alone is Jnana. Therefore, the Kingdom of God is within you.
– Ramana Maharshi

We are taught here that the worlds exist because ‘we’ exist, and that they are known because ‘we’ know our own existence as ‘I am’. In short, our Sat-Chit [Existence-Consciousness] is the cause for the existence of the worlds and for the knowledge about them.
– Sadhu Om

The heavenly vision of Jesus on some throne, along with dancing angels singing His praises is just one of an infinite number of timeless possibilities, all contained within Me.  A vision of Buddah is of the same nature.  A vision of a blinding light which beams unconditional love, same thing.  Just more possibilities which could be manifested within My awareness.

Everything is One, all is already divine, and I’m already seeing the Ultimate.  However, I haven’t seen or realized this due to mental confusions of all sorts.   The biggest confusion is ego, this feeling and belief that I am some separate independent existence from the Ultimate.  I’m not separate from the Ultimate, so there’s no particular experience which fully captures It.  The best that can be done is to take a piece of this Ultimate and project it out in front of me, like a movie hologram, and it will be seemingly separate from myself.  However, I’m looking at an aspect of Myself and there’s no real separation.

So if I want to see Myself, the Truth with a capital T, what am I to see?  There’s no particular thing to see.  I’m some sort of observer, which can always stand above any experience of forms, thoughts, or emotions.  And even the manifest forms, thoughts, and emotions come out of me.  I can experience all of that, but I’m not limited to being exclusively any particular manifestation.

For the one who has obtained the Eye of Self-Knowledge by diving deep within himself, there is no other thing to be seen or known. Why? Because, having lost the wrong knowledge that he is the body-form, he has rightly known himself to be the Formless.
– Ramana Maharshi

I hope all of this makes sense to everybody.  This worldview leads to extreme tolerance and love.  You want a vision of Jesus and His heaven?  Why not.  You want to be with Buddha?  Sure!  You’re a scientist and don’t believe in any of this?  Ok.  What do you want to see?  Planets?  Solar systems?  Galaxies?  Strange worlds with interesting technology?  Ok!  It’s up to you!  Enjoy the experience.

The only real problems arise happen when you falsely identify with what you’re projecting out of you.  Then you get caught up in jealousy, hate, anger, alienation, and all the negative suffering we wish to avoid.  The world being manifested out of you will only be as beautiful as you are on the inside.  I’ll go into that in another post.

Don’t Watch The News

Mainstream news networks are not very trustworthy.  Let’s use Fox News for example.  If you were watching their network news a few years ago, everything Obama did or proposed was evil and misguided.  It didn’t seem to matter what issue it was, if Obama was for it, they were against it.  Now let’s fast forward a few years; we have President Trump doing the exact same things they were criticizing Obama for, but Trump is praised to wide acclaim and fanfare.  The video below illustrates this perfectly.

Other networks such as MSNBC and CNN are the same way, though they root for the opposing team.  These networks are unprincipled cheerleaders for either the Republicans or the Democrats.

The bias is getting so bad, reporters and journalists are having to stay away from mainstream networks out of fear of appearing compromised.  For instance, the New York Times has recently announced that their reporters are no longer allowed on CNN’s Don Lemon or MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow’s programs because the shows are too obviously left-leaning.  Similar sorts of things are happening on the conservative end of things.  Things are so polarized it’s impossible not to notice.

There seems to finally be some acknowledgement of bias, but now the news climate is so bad, we can’t even have a dialog with one another.  You’re banned from talking to them, they’re banned from talking to you, and we all sit in our isolated bubbles, talking to ourselves.

Now that I’m on Facebook I watch my family and others fighting over this news stuff.  It’s amazing to watch how these networks control what people all over the world think and talk about.  They run a story and then my Facebook feed blows up with people I know talking about these issues, for or against, mostly parroting talking points from the articles they’ve read or news segments they’ve seen.

I struggle to pay attention to it anymore.  It’s not that I don’t care.  I do.  It’s mainly the struggle to get any information that is reliable.  I simply don’t trust any of these sources.  I’ve investigated them many times over the past twenty years, and over and over, they lie and lie and lie.  They omit key facts, they distort issues, they paint their enemies in an unfair light, and I could go on.  I want information that is complete and trustworthy.  That has the full picture.  But from what I mainly see, “news” has become spin, opinion, and bad-mouthing.  It’s a huge undertaking to get to the bottom of what’s really going on, and I no longer find it worth the energy.  It’s a massive drain on your time.

A person could be composing music, creating art, researching things you’re interested in, meditating, out hiking, spending time with family, the list goes on.  Instead you’re listening to these propaganda networks who are so bent on gaining views and keeping interest, they’ll do anything to build a loyal following, even if that means skewing the facts and pitting you against your neighbor.  And if you deeply investigate things, you realize their money comes from advertising, and who advertises?  The large corporations.  So digging deeper, you find out these networks are often promoting lines of thought which are in the best interest of the corporations.

In the past we could use the internet, but the tech giants are being shown to have a political agenda these days.  They’re picking winners and losers in the information war.  They’re tweaking their search algorithms in such a way that certain ideas and agendas are placed in front of their users while other dissenting ideas are buried where no one will ever see them.  They arbitrarily choose what we see and don’t see.  More and more it’s based on who has money.  Whoever gives these social media companies the most money get the most exposure.  And if you don’t do what they say, you’re banned, demonetized, or banished to some portion of the website where nobody will ever see you.

In today’s world we have access to information we never had access to before.  But then again, the old elite interests are working double time to make sure that that information gets buried in places we’ll never find it.

The Problem Of Others

I’d like to briefly discuss the problem of proving that other people exist.  I feel this is impossible because there’s no way to hop outside yourself and experience anything outside of yourself.  In the philosophy community, this is the problem of solipsism.  I see absolutely no way around it.  This post will be a continuation of my last post, so I recommend reading that before moving on to this material.

Let’s imagine that I am in the supermarket and I run into the woman in the figure below.  As before, I will identify my “self” as the “space” from which forms manifest, my body manifest “up close” and a woman’s figure will be projected from divine Ground into my awareness.

Just to recap a few things, I argued that people typically (wrongfully) identify themselves as their body (the two hands in the figure), along with the thoughts and emotions manifest in their experience.  So called “other” forms, such as this woman, are identified as “others” because they’re experienced differently.  For example, if a bowling ball fell from the ceiling and smashed this poor’s woman’s head in, you wouldn’t feel pain, but if that bowling ball landed on “your” hand, you’d feel pain.  These sorts of experiences lead people to believe certain forms (such as the hands and body) are “theirs” and other forms, such as the woman standing there, do not belong to them.  I argued this is incorrect.  You are the total awareness of everything you’re experiencing.  The form of “your” hands, the form of this woman, the thoughts you’re experiencing, all the sensations, the emotions you’re experiencing, it’s all you.   You can’t have an experience outside of yourself.

Alex was thoughtful enough to leave some comments on my post, and we got into a discussion about whether or not other people exist, and that lead to some considerations of ethics.  Let’s look into this.  The major point of contention seems to be the claim that this woman in front of me is just a form within my awareness, empty, like a hologram or something.  This belief that there’s nothing more beyond this appearance seems unethical.  She’s not just a form to be viewed; she has an inner world of her own!   That demands that she be treated morally, that there might be karma or something if she’s treated poorly, etc.  Ok, fair enough.  I can believe in all that, but could I ever know that?

To know that she has an inner world of her own, I’d have to somehow experience it firsthand for myself.  Is that possible?  I am the awareness of what’s happening within this “box”, this “space” of Emptiness, including all the projected forms, thoughts, and emotions currently being manifested.  How could I ever experience anything outside of the box of my own awareness?  The second I experience something that’s not me, supposedly from the “outside”, anything at all, it becomes a part of my awareness and is me.

We could try to overcome this limitation?  Let’s assume that if this woman’s form is being projected into my awareness, I not only experience “my” thoughts and emotions, but also “hers”.  Now I directly experience her “inner” world.  Surely I must now claim that she’s more than just the form!  She has an inner world and it’s being beamed straight into me when she’s right there in front of me!  But does this make her separate from “me”?  Does this solve the problem?  Only if you identify yourself as certain thought streams, emotions, or sets of forms, and not others, otherwise there is no way to make the distinction between “my” thoughts and “her” thoughts, “my” emotions and “her” emotions.  There is just forms, thoughts, and emotions manifesting within awareness.  The experience is richer now, more complex, but if you identify yourself as the total awareness of everything happening within the “space”, then we still have the same problem.  She’s still “you”, and there’s no distinction between “you” and “her”.

Hmm, let’s take this even further.  Say I not only experience “my” life, with all of its bodily sensations, thoughts, emotions, etc., but also all aspects of “her” life simultaneously!  Within my awareness is two of these “spaces”, one with the life of Jason and all of its experiences (on the left), and another the life of this woman (on the right).  This is illustrated in the next figure, where Jason and the woman are looking at one another in the supermarket.

Has this solved the problem of me being me, and her being her, and us being separate from one another?  Can I now be sure this woman has an “inner” world that is separate from “my” own?  No.  Now I am both Jason and the woman, and everything they experience.  There’s no reason to identify with the person on the left or right, exclusively.  I’m both of them.  I am the awareness that includes the total experience of Jason and the woman; this awareness includes both of their bodily sensations, both of their thoughts, both of their perceptions, and both of their emotions.

You could try to play around with this in various ways but it won’t change anything.  Say for instance I feel bodily tactile sensations of Jason on the left, but not for the woman on the right.  For her I just see what she sees and hear what she hears, but nothing more.  Then would I be predisposed to identify as Jason and not the woman?  -shrugs-  It’s up to you how you identify yourself, but if you identify as Emptiness and the total “space” of your awareness, then it doesn’t make any difference.

When I tend to believe others exist, outside of myself, I think of some massive split-screen view, containing all “existent” conscious beings, each with a “space” of their own,  populated with forms, thoughts, emotions, and other experiences which manifest from the same common Ground which we’re all using.  God is manifesting all of us, and is viewing the complete display, containing a split-screen view with innumerable “spaces” for every human, every animal, every insect, every alien, and anything else that can be consciously experienced, from all possible timelines, from all possible perspectives, from every form of life, in every possible existence; God is looking at this timeless super-split-screen-space containing all of that.   Then you say, but Jason, how do you know God exists in this way?  I don’t.  I’d have to become God and be immersed in this super-experience first-hand to know that it exists.  But assuming I became this experience, and my awareness reverted back to being Jason, how could it be described?  A fullness cannot be fully expressed using subset of its completely unique pieces.  This is especially true of experiences which are foreign to humans for which there would be no words.  But as I would like to argue, am I even choosing the forms, thoughts, and emotions which manifest, moment to moment, as Jason?  I’d argue I’m not, they’re moreso happenings.  So the degree to which God could be described by Jason is based on what God feeds into Jason to be experienced within his (and ultimately within God’s) awareness.  But if you think about it, how this any different for ANY experience?

And here’s a key insight.  If free-will were happening on the fly, like most of us believe, time would be stopping every moment, and you’d be presented with this wide variety of split-screens to choose from at each moment.  And if full-freedom were available to you, where all possible split-screens were available to you at every moment to choose from (which quantum physics seems to point to), you’d basically have that God-like perspective, make a “decision” (whatever that would mean, maybe “zooming” into one of these perspectives temporarily?), and then revert back to that God-like perspective for the next decision.   And this God-like perspective contains everybody, all possible identities, timelessly.  You’d select to be aware of something selectively for a temporary period, and then revert back to timeless awareness of the all.  This idea of “identity” seems incompatible with full-freedom.  I’ll get to that in my next post.

I’d like to write an entirely separate post focusing on the ethics of this perspective of identification with Emptiness (the “space” of your awareness).   I’ll save that discussion for then.